Nikita Sergeeich, as long as you do the conjuncture r @ uno you will always be in the red.
By order of the State Department "Sunstroke" did not hit the short list of the American Academy Award)))))))
And if for garlic?
All the pictures of Nikita are dated to the budget, not one of them even reached the level of self-sufficiency, and there is no need to say that he makes "deep films" that do not go to the general public.
As a rule, such films are made at their own expense and not at state expense.
I think that with Mikhalkov, as a director, you need to ask for the return of the funds that he spent from the state budget on the shooting after the release.
And what is right, he took money from the state to shoot the picture, took it off, let it go, got it from the rental, return the debt to the state.
I, as a taxpayer, are completely opposed to my taxes going to shoot pictures of Mikhalkov, to support the union of copyright holders of Russia.
A sort of private club, which for no reason gets money from our pocket.
What did the Union of owners of Russia for the people?
Released a lot of colorful cartoons for children?
Has released a lot of free children's books, recorded free songs?
What did the union of owners for Russia?
Why do we deduct taxes to them?
The fact that the products of our "record companies" no one buys primarily these companies are to blame, we must choose normal performers and normal songs. That there is no income from our films?
So remove such films so that people go to the cinema.
Make a product that will be in demand or do not do anything.
As long as you make Gaunos, do not hide as piracy, etc. will be in the red.
In general, about piracy is a myth.
Fees from rentals of the same Russian cartoons about the heroes showed it.