Should a woman wait for a "civil husband" from prison?
Do you know why there are more married women in our country than married men? It turned out that the reason - the so-called "civil marriages". The woman already considers herself married, and the man still “chooses”.
And some people manage to think that they live in a “civil marriage” not with singles, but with married men, who, of course, are about to divorce. Yes Yes.
In a word, this word, civil marriage - it is not very good and does not express anything. Well, that is, it hints at cohabitation, but no longer gives any rights - neither moral, nor material, nor property. It is very well known to men, and therefore they sing a song about “we are so good together” and “why should the state interfere”. To then, if that, without unnecessary procedures section jointly acquired dump in the sunset.
Only here life turns in different directions. Consider, for example, a situation like jailing.
If the so-called "civil husband" got for three years in places not so distant as to act in this case?
A man must wait from prison. And wait is not just passive, locking the vagina on the lock. And to wait actively, to transfer the transmission, to feed the entire zone, and for several years.
Should a woman, whom a man at the best of times and did not want to marry, voluntarily and completely consciously become a “baulitee,” voluntarily become? Spending your time, money, property on a person who was not going to do something similar for her?
What do you think?
P.S. By the way, the concubine will not be allowed on a long date - you still have to sign, if that.